Have a request? Tweet me at @renwulf

Tuesday, March 15, 2016

Fright Night (Original vs Remake)

Fright Night


Original
Remake
1985
2011
Actors: Chris Sarandon, William Ragsdale & Amanda Bearse
Actors: Anton Yelchin, Colin Farrell & David Tennant
Director: Tom Holland
Director: Craig Gillespie
Run Time: 1hour 46 minutes
Run Time: 1hour 46 Minutes
Acting: I was not impressed with the acting chops in this version. Lack luster casting.

Acting: With the cast being made up of accomplished actors as it is the acting in this one out ranked the original.
Effects: There wasn't really that many effects to 
 be honest and the few they had were okay.
Effects: Both practical and cgi effects were used in this and well done at that but nothing you haven't seen before.
Intensity: The intensity was lacking in this version, but a lot of mid 80s horror did.
Intensity: Higher than average intensity but not thru the roof.
Review:
Hands down over all the Remake wins special effects, better storyline and casting. Over all the remake was a much better movie than the Orginal.

Friday, March 11, 2016

The Fly (Original vs Remake)

The Fly


Original
Remake
1958
1986
Actors: David Hedison, Vincent Price & Patricia Owens
Actors: Jeff Goldblum, Geena Davis & John Getz
Director: Kurt Newmann
Director: David Cronenburg
Run Time: 1hour 34 minutes
Run Time: 1hour 36 Minutes
Acting: For me was not that impressive as a matter of fact it was ordinary for the 50s & 60s.

Acting: Jeff Goldblum shined in this version and played his role like only he could.
Effects: Not that the 50s had the best special effects but even for it's day this film lacked for quality effects.
Effects: In the 80s, special effects were starting to evolve and this film was (imo) very much in the forefront of that evolution.


Review:
While both films had the same basic plot, the storylines itself separate these two movies. To me, there is a clear winner between them, the remake.

Tuesday, March 8, 2016

The Wolf Man (Original vs Remake)

The Wolf man




Original
Remake
1941
2010
Actors: Lon Chaney Jr., Claude Rains & Evelyn Ankers
Actors: Benicio Del Toro, Anthony Hopkins & Emily Blunt
Director: George Waggner
Director: Joe Johnston
Run Time: 1hour 10 minutes
Run Time: 1hour 43 Minutes
Acting: This version has a lot of well known actors and it shows.

Acting: This film has an all-star cast and almost guarantees it's success.
The gradual transformation of human to 
wolf man in this film was well done (for the 1940s). Atmosphere, lighting and such were the
 major effects for this film and done well.
Lighting, sets, plot, storyline & effects were all on point. This film IMO is one of the best made horror films done in the past 10+ years.


Review:
Both leading men played Lawrence Talbot in different ways but both played the part extremely well and made the part their own. The reboot kept to the original wolf man makeup look which speaks volumes. Both versions are worth seeing and I would recommend seeing both. In this reviewer's eyes there is no clear winner or looser between these two.

Friday, March 4, 2016

Nightmare on Elm Street (Original vs. Remake)

Nightmare on Elm Street




Original
Remake
1984
2010
Actors: Robert Englund, Johhny Depp & Heather Langenkamp
Actors: Jackie Earl Haley, Rooney Mara & Kyle Gallner
Director: Wes Craven
Director: Samuel Bayer
Run Time: 1hour 31 minutes
Run Time: 1hour 35 Minutes
Acting: IMO there will only be one Freddie (Robert Englund), he made this character an Icon. A few young up-incomers ,like Johnny Depp, made the teenagers real.

Acting: Being honest, I have never cared for Jackie Earl Haley and this film shows you why. Other than that we have some namers and up-incomers that for the most part played their roles well.
Effects: In terms of 1984, this film 
accomplished wonders in terms of practical
 effects.
Effects: Freddie makeup was jacked up plain and simple. A lot of the effects as the original were done via CGI and it shows in not such a good way.
Intensity: 30+ years later this film can still scare 
a first time viewer.
Intensity: Not even intense on today's standards. Lack luster horror.
Review:
Hands down over all the Original wins with Robert Englund defining the Freddie role, special effects team accomplishing new effects. When the original is this good it's hard to beat or even come close to replicate its success. I personally have been avoiding watching the remake since it's release and would not recommend anyone wasting their time on the remake.

Tuesday, March 1, 2016

The Haunting (Original vs. Remake)

The Haunting


Original
Remake
1963
1999
Actors: Julie Harris, Claire Bloom &
Richard Johnson
Actors: Liam Neeson, Owen Wilson & Lili Taylor
Director: Robert Wise
Director: Jan de Bont
Run Time: 1hour 54 minutes
Run Time: 1hour 53 Minutes
While you don't actually see any ghosts in this version, all the lighting, sound effects make this a scary film with brilliant camera work.
The special effects on this film had their hands full with this one. The practical and cgi effects were near perfect in this version of the film.
Review:
Both Julie Harris and Lili Taylor played the lead female character brilliantly. Casting on all accounts was outstanding. While the original was more so of the book the films were bases on than the remake. The remake is a visual movie while the original was more of a psychological movie. Both are good in their own rights.



          


Friday, February 26, 2016

Dark Moon Rising (2015)

Dark Moon Rising (2015)




Actors:
Eric Roberts, Stasi Esper &  Billy Banks

Director:
Justin Price

Runtime:
2h 4min

Plot:
A group of shape shifting werewolves descends upon small town in search of a girl who is reborn every 2000 years. She holds the key to their survival and all will die who stands in their way.

Trailer:



Review:
Cgi effects aren't that bad but the best in the film was the title sequence. For the most part they're not blended very well. While going off the plot it doesn't sound like a bad movie. Watching the story play out was painful. The storyline is all over the place and it takes forever to actually get to the plot.
This by far has got to be one of the most painfully bad horror movies, I have sat through.




















Tuesday, February 23, 2016

London Voodoo (2004)

London Voodoo (2004)




Actors:
Doug Cockle, Sara Stewart & Grace Sprott

Director:
Robert Pratton

Runtime:
1 h 39min

Plot:
A young man relocates his family from New York to London. There his wife discovers a new sexuality and power that threatens to tear apart his family.


Trailer:



Review:
An independent British film. While you can see the film makers have talent, it's frustrating to see it compromised by the lack of funding. The ideas of this film you can tell come from Omen and Amityville among others. I've seen it all before and was not told it in a new way as to actually make me like it.